Score each statement from 5 (this describes our meetings accurately) to 1 (they are not like this at all).
- Everyone is clear and aligned about the purpose of the meeting
- All the items on the agenda are relevant and of interest to everyone in the room
- There are “no surprises” on the agenda
- Anything “for information” is dealt with outside and before the meeting
- Everyone is clear about whether items are for discussion or decision
- Any papers essential for the meeting are circulated well in advance, so everyone has sufficient time to consider them
- Everyone is well prepared for the meeting
- We have very clear, effective and well-understood processes for decision making
- The most important issues are always discussed first and in most detail
- We have an appropriate balance between issues that focus on the past (what happened), the present (what do we need to do now) and the future (what we need to do differently)
- Everyone feels safe in voicing an honest opinion
- We consider issues from multiple perspectives
- Everyone feels respected and listened to – especially the less confident and most introspective team members
- Everyone feels they have said what they need to
- People feel able to ask questions about issues, with which they are not familiar
- We are effective at parking issues that might side-track us
- Apart from planned regular agenda items, issues rarely continue unresolved for several meetings
- We are robust in our challenges but once a decision is made, we support each other fully
- There is very little politics or power-play in our meetings
- There is genuine consensus on decisions, not acquiescence
- Decisions never get overturned by lobbying after the meeting
- We maintain a good balance between sticking to the agenda timings and ensuring that issues are properly explored
- We are courteous to outsiders presenting to our meeting
- We build in time during the meeting to reflect on difficult decisions
- Individuals or subgroups are not allowed to dominate the discussion
- Everyone is engaged throughout the meeting (rather than checking their emails)
- We review the quality of our meetings from time to time
- The person chairing the meeting ensures that the discussion is summarised at appropriate points
- Everyone is clear at the end of the meeting what has been decided
- Are meetings enjoyable or bruising? (Do team members look forward to them?)
Scores:
120 plus – your meetings are effective and enjoyable
80 to 120 – quite a lot of time and energy are wasted
40 to 80 – you can think of better places to be and better things to do
>40 – avoiding these meetings will be good for your health!
Copyright – David Clutterbuck